Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FutureWise Finance
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-08 14:06:26
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (8915)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- California plans to phase out new gas heaters by 2030
- Today’s Climate: June 9, 2010
- How to keep safe from rip currents: Key facts about the fast-moving dangers that kill 100 Americans a year
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- At Freedom House, these Black men saved lives. Paramedics are book topic
- Telemedicine abortions just got more complicated for health providers
- Here's How Sarah Ferguson Is Celebrating the Coronation At Home After Not Being Invited
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Today’s Climate: June 7, 2010
Ranking
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- 2 shot at Maryland cemetery during funeral of 10-year-old murder victim
- How to Watch King Charles III and Queen Consort Camilla’s Coronation on TV and Online
- Jim Hines, first sprinter to run 100 meters in under 10 seconds, dies at 76
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Here's what will happen at the first White House hunger summit since 1969
- The Experiment Aiming To Keep Drug Users Alive By Helping Them Get High More Safely
- World Hunger Rises with Climate Shocks, Conflict and Economic Slumps
Recommendation
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Battle in California over Potential Health Risks of Smart Meters
Today’s Climate: June 19-20, 2010
A box of 200 mosquitoes did the vaccinating in this malaria trial. That's not a joke!
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Real Housewives Star Lisa Barlow’s Mother's Day Amazon Picks Will Make Mom Feel Baby Gorgeous
Lawsuits Accuse Fracking Companies of Triggering Oklahoma’s Earthquake Surge
Scientists debate how lethal COVID is. Some say it's now less risky than flu